The script opens with Modi's obedient media outlets, using a sensational approach to report on the dismantling of a terror module known ...
The script opens with Modi's obedient media outlets, using a sensational approach to report on the dismantling of a terror module known as the Faridabad or Al Falah Module in IIOJandK, Faridabad, Sharanpur, and Ahmadabad, where 10 people were arrested. Indian media also reported the seizure of 2900 kg of explosives and weapons, including AK-47s. This operation was conducted based on information provided by Dr. Adeel Ahmad Rathar, who is associated with the Faridabad terror module and connected to terrorist operatives in Pakistan. This news served as a setup for another fabricated false flag operation by the Modi government just a few hours later—the explosion at the Subhash Marg traffic signal near the Red Fort in Delhi. This carefully planned 'terror incident' was organized and promoted by a Saffronized mindset involving BJP's political and military leaders, supported by Godi Media outlets. The BJP's political leadership, after suffering embarrassment during Operation Sindhoor, turned to repeated jingoism to restore their political influence ahead of the Bihar elections. This war-like rhetoric was consistently driven by advocates of the Hindutva ideology, such as PM Modi himself and figures like Rajnath Singh and Amit Shah. At the same time, senior military officials with political leanings joined the movement, spreading venomous accusations against Pakistan. To support the political and military leadership, Indian media also launched an anti-Pakistan campaign, focusing on linking Pakistani intelligence agencies with terrorist organizations operating within India. For a rational mind, understanding this well-coordinated campaign comes as no surprise, as the BJP leadership's constant rhetoric is a standard script before executing a false flag operation to serve their political interests. Although, the orchestrated event of the Delhi Blast, similar to Pehlgam and Pulwama, is nothing more than a manufactured hype. It is essential to identify inconsistencies in the Indian narrative aimed at achieving political gains both domestically and internationally.
The so-called 'Faridabad module' narrative, which Indian media presented with great urgency, seemed to be just the opening act of the Red Fort explosion storyline. Within a short time, various sources repeated the same information, concluding with a large seizure of 2,900 kilograms of explosives and an alleged link to Pakistan. However, upon closer examination, these claims collapsed under their own contradictions. The supposed mastermind, Dr. Adeel Ahmad Rathar, was reportedly captured on CCTV while putting up militant posters in Srinagar, recorded by a camera that had only been set up three days prior to the event—a coincidence too suspicious to be genuine. Despite extensive monitoring in IIOJandK, authorities later 'found' an AK-47 in his hospital locker, which had remained undisturbed for almost a year. These implausibilities reveal how easily facts can be manipulated for political purposes. Indian police accounts also conflicted: while IIOJandK officials stated they seized AK-47s, Faridabad Police denied this, mentioning regular rifles instead. Even the names of suspects differed across reports, with 'Muzammil Shakeel' and 'Mufazzil Shakeel' being used interchangeably—an elementary mistake in what was supposedly a high-profile counterterrorism case.
As the narrative unfolded, its illogical nature increased. Dr. Muzammil Shakeel was charged with storing large quantities of explosives in Faridabad, with claims ranging from 350 to 2,900 kg, highlighting a media pursuit of sensationalism rather than factual accuracy. A female physician, Shahina, was oddly associated with an AK-47, while the supposed blast vehicle changed from a Maruti Suzuki to a Hyundai i20. Ownership trails intertwined through various names until 'Tariq from Pulwama' was discovered to be Amir Rashid, a plumber from Srinagar. The contradictions exposed not chaos but a deliberate strategy, part of a coordinated information campaign designed to create antagonists and justify animosity towards Pakistan.
When the explosion took place close to Red Fort on November 10, 2025, the storyline reached its peak. Early police reports described it as a CNG cylinder explosion, but this quickly shifted within hours to claims of a 'vehicle-borne IED.' The number of people on board changed multiple times, and the supposed location of the crime showed neither a crater nor any signs of explosives. The arrival of Home Minister Amit Shah at the scene coincided with a sudden shift in the story from an accident to a major terror attack. This well-known pattern—sudden arrests, media frenzy, unclear blast details, and quick blame directed at Pakistan—forms the core of BJP's repeated political performance. From Pathankot and Pulwama to Pahalgam and now Delhi, every so-called 'terror incident' under Modi and Doval follows the same blueprint: instill fear, stir up nationalism, and use tragedy for political gain.
Under Modi's leadership, incidents such as Assam (2014), Gurdaspur (2015), Pathankot and Uri (2016), Amarnath (2017), Pulwama (2019), Rajouri and Reasi (2023-24), and Pahalgam (2025) have occurred in a notably political pattern, often preceding elections or crises, aligning with the BJP's strategy to generate war-related fear. This trend reveals how terrorism has been utilized for political advantage, blurring the line between security measures and propaganda. Although some Indian experts caution that nationalism should not substitute for accountability, their concerns are overshadowed by a media environment fueled by fear. Those advocating for openness highlight that many accused individuals are actually Indian citizens, not foreign infiltrators, yet these facts are suppressed as propaganda overshadows law enforcement and populism takes the place of actual policy in a growing authoritarian democracy.
In the end, the Red Fort explosion story represents the decline of truth in Modi's India. What should have been a subject for forensic investigation was instead transformed into a media event designed to rekindle a struggling political agenda. The global community has seen this pattern before—initial outrage, accusations, and then silence when evidence falls apart. Every fabricated incident undermines India's ethical position, revealing how deeply political self-interest has damaged state integrity. When governments adopt deception as a tactic, they not only lose credibility internationally but also erode trust domestically. The true explosion that India faces today is not at the Red Fort, but within its institutions, media, and democracy itself. Until truth triumphs over propaganda, peace in the region will continue to be held captive by a few individuals who confuse manipulation with patriotism.
Omay Aimen
The author often writes about topics related to national and regional security, concentrating on issues that significantly affect these areas. You can contact her at omayaimen333@gmail.com.
Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
COMMENTS